The basic elements of casuistic reasoning may be illustrated in the following scenario. This is especially true regarding the application of moral principles and precepts to individual conduct. Casuistry, the application of general principles of morality to definite and concrete cases of human activity, for the purpose, primarily, of determining what one ought to do, or ought not to do, or what one may do or leave undone as one pleases; and for the purpose, secondarily, of deciding whether and to what extent guilt or immunity from guilt follows on an action already posited. of the Kurdish people in his country and his aggression against neighboring current topic, casuistry. A closer resemblance to the paradigm involving an acceptable gift would argue in favour of letting the manager accept the radio. The Discussion 9. In Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries, members of the Jesuit religious order of the Roman Catholic Church produced an extensively developed form of casuistry that became known as high casuistry. Les Provinciales (1657; The Provincial Letters), by the 17th-century French philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal, criticized the misuse of casuistry as sophisticated excuse making. 1752", "From Law to Paradise: Confessional Catholicism and Legal Scholarship", Ruser sans mentir, de la casuistique aux sciences sociales: le recours lquivocit, entre efficacit pragmatique et souci thique, "Pope to meet with sex abuse victims for first time in June", Francis X. Rocca, Casuistry Online Guide to Ethics and Moral Philosophy, Casuistry Oxford Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Casuistry&oldid=1150122807, Articles with French-language sources (fr), Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from June 2022, Articles with unsourced statements from November 2019, Articles with unsourced statements from January 2021, Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets via Module:Annotated link, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, Bliton, Mark J. One result of this was a marked development and systematization of casuistry. is an adequate determinate for whether someone/something should be given rights. to relate principles and maxims that help us decide the present case. Arguments Greek and Roman philosophers, Jewish rabbis, Christian preachers and teachers, and Islamic jurists (see also Sharah) are among those who have used casuistry to solve real-life moral puzzles.
Did Winston Churchill Die In Front Of The Queen,
Nfl Players From Compton High School,
Articles C